Monday, October 10, 2005

A great moment in the history of journalism

The column written by Howard Kurtz - TV's Newest Anchor: A Smirk in Progress, (found via atrios) is a great piece on one of my favorite comedians, Stephen Colbert. It talks about his career and how he delights in skewering hypocracy in all of it's forms. Colbert wonders why there aren't more like him in the MSM.

The key grafs:

When Colbert talks about skewering hypocrites, he makes clear that, like Stewart, he cares about politics as more than a punch line. He recalls Vice President Cheney, in a CNBC interview last year, being asked about having said it was "pretty well confirmed" that terrorist Mohammed Atta had met with an Iraqi official in Prague -- part of a White House attempt to demonstrate a link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. Cheney denied making the comment, but "The Daily Show" later aired a tape of a 2001 "Meet the Press" interview in which the vice president had said the Atta meeting was "pretty well confirmed."

"When Dick Cheney says, 'I never said that,' and then we play the tape, why did we do it?" Colbert says. "Why wasn't it done broadly? Because he wasn't speaking about something inconsequential. It wasn't like we were playing gotcha journalism over some quibble. It was over weapons of mass destruction. That's not advocacy journalism. That's objectivity in its most raw form."


Good stuff.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home